| dc.contributor.author | Havemann, Johanna | |
| dc.contributor.author | Munene, Aurelia | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ngugi, Wangari Joyce | |
| dc.contributor.author | Obanda, Johanssen | |
| dc.contributor.author | Owango, Joy | |
| dc.contributor.author | Saderi, Daniela | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-16T20:09:45Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-16T20:09:45Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2021-08-23 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Saderi, D., Owango, J., Munene, A., Joyce-Ngugi, W., Obanda, J., & Havemann, J. (2021, 21 agosto). Guest Post - Best Practices and Innovative Approaches to Peer Review in Africa. The Scholarly Kitchen. https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/08/23/guest-post-best-practices-and-innovative-approaches-to-peer-review-in-africa/?informz=1 | es_MX |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2690-8085 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2021/08/23/guest-post-best-practices-and-innovative-approaches-to-peer-review-in-africa/ | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://angola.redalyc.org//handle/123456789/79 | |
| dc.description | Over the past couple of years, there has been an increased level of criticism around this approach, particularly its inherent biases, the often insufficient level of quality feedback, and the barriers it creates, making it more difficult for certain groups of researchers | es_MX |
| dc.description.abstract | Originated and established in a western context over decades, research assessment and quality assurance are commonly achieved through a practice called “peer review”. Typically, one to three scholars of a research discipline similar to the one described in a manuscript submitted to a journal for publication assess research rigor based on their personal experience and informed by the standards established in their research field. | es_MX |
| dc.language.iso | en | es_MX |
| dc.publisher | Society for Scholarly Publishing | es_MX |
| dc.title | Guest Post — Best Practices and Innovative Approaches to Peer Review in Africa | es_MX |
| dc.type | Article | es_MX |
